Rethink Afghanistan

Yesterday, after I found out that we had a day off of baseball I took a quick trip to the library to renew my library card. I found three movies, Taxi to the Dark Side, Rethink Afghanistan, and Gunner Palace. I made myself a huge bag of popcorn and watched all of them. Taxi to the Dark Side was probably the most moving in the fact that it showed dramatic images of how prisoners were tortured to get information. The worst part about the detention system is that when a raid happens and the coalition forces do not find evidence of any terrorism they still detain the suspect. It goes against everything that America stands for. They are considered guilty until proven Innocent. George W. Bush specifically declared terrorists as not apart of the Geneva convention. That means that if a person is suspected to be a terrorist then they do not have any war time rights and the US forces can do what they want with them. That is absolutely horrible. Also, when these people who are not found guilty in raids get sent to detention camps they are tortured and harassed for information. They could not have anything to give. There is no trial for them to know why they are there. The system is completely flawed. The next movie, Gunner Palace, was a documentary about a division who were stationed at a bombed out palace. The camera followed them everywhere and captured their daily raids and even the multiple IED attacks. This division was attacked by an IED an impressive 18 times. All the soldiers said that they were not scared of firefights but were horrified of IED's. IED's can be hidden in trash and turned over cars, the problem is that the entire nation is covered in trash and rubble. The soldiers have to just cringe and wait in anticipation as they drive past cardboard boxes and piles of trash. The amazing part about the documentary was the lack of support by the citizens. Whenever US troops show up on the scene of a terrorist bombing the citizens are more mad that the Americans are there than a bomb killed their friends. It is a very tough war to fight. There is no conventional enemy. The last movie Rethink Afghanistan really put everything together for me. This movie was a documentary about how the war was started, how we screwed up and the damage we have done, and how we can fix everything. There were a lot of interviews with citizens and personal stories of the 40% of people without jobs. The affect of the war is a lot more widespread than the death and casualty counts. There are over 250,000 people without homes because of American air strikes. All of these people do not have jobs and starve because their crop fields have been blown up. With all of this destruction and devastation the Afghan people look to the ones who are doing the most damage to blame, and that is the US forces. The majority of the Taliban forces are comprised of people who have suffered from their friends or family being injured or killed by coalition forces. The rest are just there to fight so that they can put food on the table for their family. The Taliban is the only form of steady money available to the citizens. They offer $8 a day just to fight with them. Also, a big misconception is that the Taliban is connected with Al-Qeada. That is completely false. Al-Qeada is no where in Afghanistan and American generals know that. The Taliban is not an international threat at all either. Their goal is to take control over the villages and to stop foreign forces from invading their land. The war should no longer be fought with weapons but with trust. We need to gain the trust of the Afghan people by giving them jobs and helping them instead of destroying them. There is a program that supports the Afghans and gives them some money to work on infrastructure. This program is very similar to the New Deal. The citizens are paid to help improve the infrastructure of Afghanistan while putting money into the economy. If the yearly budget of 40 billion dollars in Afghanistan to fight the war was used to get the Afghans jobs and build infrastructure then well over half of the unemployed could have jobs for over ten years. That is how we can win this war. Conventional strategies have proven unsuccessful with the Soviet invasion and the British invasion and now the American invasion. Can we not learn from history? These people do not want a foreign power in their country at all even if it is for a good cause.

Collateral Damage

No mater how noble the war is whether it is World War II fighting the Germans or fighting for oil, as some may think, in the Middle East, all wars will have collateral damage. The only difference is that today the media has easy access to the public through the Internet and can publish hundreds of gruesome pictures that are too gory for newspapers. That is why as American involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan increases the public opinion about the war turns more negative. No one wants to see innocent civilians being killed, but the fact of the matter is that that is war. When the enemy is using the civilians as a cover and doesn't wear a clear uniform to identify themselves it is very hard to determine friend from foe. Does that mean that killing innocent civilians is okay, hell no. However, there needs to be some leniency for the troops overseas because of the haze of war. For example, when a road block is set up and a car does not stop after warning shots it seems clear that they are enemies right? Not always the case. Marine divisions have reportedly killed Innocent unarmed civilians as they tried to keep going through the road block not stopping at the warning shots. It is all about the haze of war. The civilians should have turned away after the warning shots and since they did not then the Marines had to stop the truck because it could easily be filled with explosives. These improvised explosions have increased dramatically over the years. I have found a website that shows the actual reported IED attacks and there have been an incredible amount of attacks that hit coalition troops daily. Living with IED's is a daily threat and is the number one killer of troops. That is why when American forces see a car that is coming towards a road block and doesn't stop they get a little nervous. They know friends that have died and have heard stories of cars driving within a few hundred feet of a convoy and detonating hundreds of pounds of explosives. The war is not black and white anymore. I believe that civilian deaths should be monitored and watched to make sure it doesn't get too high but eliminating all civilian casualties is impossible.

War Crimes

At first when I wanted to research the war in Afghanistan I realized that the situation there is so complex that it would take months to research the history and the current situation we are facing let alone create an opinion. Then I encountered a great article about the war crimes being commited in Afghanistan. The Rolling Stones have published pictures of the brutal war crimes that the pentagon tried to cencor. There is a warning before you see the pictures and do not take the warning lightly. These pictures are very gruesome. However, Rolling Stones and I believe that America should know what is happening overseas and what type of image the Afghan people are getting of American people. At first I believed that certain war crimes like accidentally shooting an unarmed civilian that gets too close to the platton should be adressed and lightly penalized. This is because of the haze of war. In the Middle East soldiers are scared to death every time they get on a road because of road side bombs and IED's. These Improvised Explosive Devices can be triggered from miles away where the Taliban can film the attack. There is very little that the US forces can do about it and that is extremely frustrating. That is why I believe that a little anger is okay when it comes down to accidentally killing civilians that come too close because you never know if they have a bomb straped to them. However, after seeing the pictures and hearing what the 3rd platoon has done it has really upset me and has changed my opinion about being leanient.

Libya

I have watched multiple videos on Libya and the rebellion. I have gotten a good sense of what is going on there now. The majority of the population is trying to overthrow their dictator, Gaddafi. They have been inspired by the revolutions of their two neighboring countries and want their own peace and rights. The bbc had a great video interview on an everyday construction worker who was about to join the rebel forces to stop Gaddafi. The way the BBC portrayed him was very interesting. He did not seem like a hot headed man that was out for revenge. He was even referred to as a very nice and light hearted man. However, when he is asked if he has any doubts about joining the rebels he is strong and tells of the struggles that his family had to go through because of Gaddafi. His brothers were also apart of the rebel forces and his 17 year old brother was shot in the arm a month ago. However, instead of talking about how he is scared he quotes his mother telling him and his brothers, "you either live as a man or die as a man, whichever of you dies it's worth you dying for Libya." These are the most inspirational words that I have heard. It shows that they truly believe in what they are fighting for and that the fighting is just and there is almost no other alternative than to fight. However, even though the Rebels have the heart they are really lacking supplies especially with the arms embargo with foreign nations. Overall, there is a general push to get Gaddafi out of power and there has already been talk of Gaddafi trying to reason with the rebels by saying that he would get out of power if they let him and his family go free with their wealth in tact. The rebels denied this offer on the fact that it would not give Gaddafi enough punishment. There has been talk of creating a no fly zone over Libya but to be honest I do not know what this is all about. Is the UN discussing this as a commercial no fly zone for the safety of travelers or a military no fly zone to help control the skies?

Recap of the Cases

Case #1
The verdict with Kevin Murphy was in my opinion the right decision; he was guilty. The specific acts that he did on Elise Roberts were totally fine and in that situation humorous. The stress of the workplace makes Kevin have to make jokes and unfortunately Elise did not take these jokes as well as Kevin had hoped. At first its not sexual harassment for the first few times it seems just like playful harmless jokes. However, as soon as Elise Roberts told Kevin to stop and went to the ECOE to actually complain then Kevin should had stopped and since he did not then this is a case of sexual harassment. Also another fact that really helped Elise Roberts case was that her employers did not do much to fix the situation. In my opinion this is very wrong and Kevin Murphy was definitely guilty of sexual harassment. The only way that Kevin would have been found Innocent is if he stopped after Elise filed her first written complaint or if the employer transferred Kevin to a different section or new partner to solve the problem. This way Elise could easily stay away from Kevin and not have to interact with him. Where as in the previous position Elise was forced to interact with him and feel extremely uncomfortable.

Case #2
I was a little shocked that the jury came up with a verdict of not guilty. There were a few things that really stood out to me that made me think that this really was a rape. First and most important was the fact that they had sex with their clothes on. I hope I dont have to explain this but when you have sex you nine times out of ten take your clothes off unless its like the movies and its really intimate and that was not the case here. Susan said that she did not want to take off her clothes and therefore she clearly did not want to have sex. However, David deliberately went against her word and pulled up her skirt and had sex with her. This is where it gets iffy. I know its probably too much information to ask Susan or David but if she was reacting okay to the sex then that would disprove her case and David would in fact be innocent. However, they did not share this information so I assume that Susan was not reacting at all and was very displeased with what David was doing. The fact that she was kissing David back does not mean much because this we know that she does not mind the sexual activity but she made it clear that she does not want to go any further than kissing and since David did, it is rape.


Here at DHS this is a silent issue in my opinion. So many people get the casual slap on the butt or even further actions as a joke and the girls usually respond with a playful laughing stop. Well, in this case she did say no but does she mean it? That is the huge question. Where does it cross the line? When is it a joke and when is it sexual harassment? What we can use from the case with Elise Roberts is that if they actually have a serious complaint or go to a higher authority then it is definatly time to stop. However, in some cases that’s too late and it is already sexual harassment so some good advice from The Kramcakes is "no means no just ask." Yea it seems awkward to ask in the heat of it all but it could save you from a 30 year sentence in prison. Girls are messed up they say no a lot and then you dont push it any further and then three minutes later they want to do it, but guys cannot assume that girls will always want to do it because if they truly mean that they dont want to that 2 times out of ten then you get screwed no pun intended.

Down Range Part 5 (not final post)

Sorry for the confusion followers, or just Mr. Kramer, I thought I was finished with my blogs but I had to do one more before my final post so this is my last blog and my previous post is my final post. In the seventh chapter of Down Range it talks about the stories of downed pilots and forces stuck behind enemy lines. The portrayal, unlike other Hollywood portrayals of SEALs, that Special Ops personnel always leave no man behind is absolutely true. The SEALs feel that "the recovery of a brother warrior or a fellow citizen has a unique priority in our military culture."(197) The SEALs would drop what they are doing and go balls to the wall in order to rescue an American citizen in harms way. This is because of the fact that they value the lives of their country men and also because today they know all too well that the enemy will stop at nothing to torture these poor souls. For example, "we first saw this with the dragging of bodies through the streets of Mogadishu, Somalia. Now we see videotaped beheadings of contractors, civilians and Iraqi security forces taken hostage."(198) To be caught by the enemy is the worst possible scenario, for some cases worse than dying. This is why the SEALs would spare their own lives just to save one life from being captured. Imagine your own brother or sister being surrounded by kidnappers that their only goal is to torture them in the worst way possible. This is exactly how each and every SEAL feels because when a group goes through that hard core training together they come out as brothers. However, this makes the commander wonder, "how many men do I put at how much risk to recover the remains for a fellow brother?"(198) This is the hardest question a commander can answer. For example, in Vietnam one airman went down deep behind enemy lines. There were multiple helicopters launched to drop in a group of Special Forces to find the pilot. However, just when the helo's crossed the DMZ they were berated with enemy Anti Aircraft Artillery fire. The AAA shot down and killed the troops in all of the Helicopters killing over 25 men. So the question is do you send more troops for this brother waiting for help behind enemy lines. In the end they sent out two SEALs to go up stream on a suicide mission posing as Vietnam fisherman. They ended up saving Tim Norris and created the plot for the famous movie BAT 21 starring Danny Glover and Gene Hackman. This story is similar but not as happy as the story of Neil Robert in Afghanistan. He was flung from a helicopter as it was shot down by an RPG and was surrounded by enemy insurgents. His fellow SEALs did all they could to get to him through the massive enemy forces, but they were simply too outnumbered. A few SEALs attempted a last ditch effort to "recover his remains, seven special operators died on that mountain in Afghanistan. The loss of these men sent a shock wave through the special operations community."(204) Total number 7 does not seem like a lot, but when you take into consideration that there are only 50 SEALs in an entire division and that the average number of SEALs that go out on a mission is 4 then you start to realize how big of a loss those 7 lives are. The 6 men could have ran down the mountain and called in an air strike to take out the enemy forces but they had to at least try to save a fellow brother. Death is one of the things that all military personnel have to deal with especially the SEALs. To die for one's country has always been the most honorable death a man can have. That is why so many SEALs feel that the danger of their life is worth every second they are on the ground in the Middle East. One SEAL wrote, "My time in the teams was special...I loved being a SEAL. I died doing what made me happy. Very few people have the luxury of that."(204) This to me is a perfect ending to the chapter and even the book. Life is worth nothing unless you live it doing something you are truly proud of.

Down Range pt. 5

The conclusion of this novel was a humbling one. Throughout the book Dick Couch demonstrated the amazing capabilities of the United States Navy SEALs and the American military. However, I am left with one question, what are the affects of taking the lives of these people? Maybe it is not so bad because the SEALs feel that they are the enemy and deserve what they get, but then wouldn't they think that it is okay to kill the SEALs because they are enemies of them? That reminds me of something I read earlier in the book that keeps coming up, the SEALs have a saying "he got what he deserved." If a man attacks a SEAL with a knife then he will probably be put into submission and taken prisoner. However, if a man raises their gun at a Navy SEAL then he is asking to get killed. A man never feels that taking a life is a good thing. Contrary to what the movies portray almost all of the SEALs are well educated men who graduate from Yale, Annapolis, and other ivy league schools. They all do not want to have to have someones blood on their hands. They will do anything they can to take away the threat that the enemy portrays, but if that threat is lethal then it is absolutely necessary for the SEALs to use lethal force. In the later part of this book the author talks about how the SEAL teams were used in Iraq for sniper support. This is one of the most morally draining roles someone can play in a war. Staring through the scope at an enemies torso with your finger squeezing the trigger that will end this mans life and orphan his family, and widow his wife. It is so personal that it has caused so many soldiers to come home with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. So what is the solution? Is peace the solution? HELL NO. In my opinion the pursuit of world peace is for the naive hippies that are safe behind the forces that protect this country. Where ever there are drugs, guns, money, and power there will be violence. In my opinion the world will no longer see the heroic World Wars, but will be fought with small numbers of specialized forces only. The Special Forces of the American military will be the the ones fighting the wars instead of the large infantry divisions. For example, there are more and more threats of drug cartels taking over countries and terrorist activities and nuclear weapons. All of these threats can be limited if not taken out by the intelligence the SEALs can obtain from being behind the enemy lines with their stealthy tactics. Then this intel can be used to take out the threats with the least amount of damage done. Soon wars will have casualty numbers in the hundreds rather than the 100,000's. This is also because of the SEALs ability to capture high value personnel and targets like in Afghanistan and Iraq. Overall the mass killings of trench warfare, and the terrible collateral damage of Hiroshima are things of the past. Today and tomorrow are for the Special Ops Forces who can take down governmental leaders like they did in Panama, or cease control of ships that smuggled oil like in the Gulf to support terrorism, or simply arrest personnel involved with drug cartels that help support regimes to overtake their governments. This unconventional warfare that was founded in the Vietnam war is the future of warfare.